England cricketer apologises to Indian star Cheteshwar Pujara for ‘racist’ behaviour

Somerset seamer Jack Brooks has issued an apology to Indian star Cheteshwar Pujara for his racist behaviour through the latter’s time at Yorkshire. Notably, Pujara had represented Yorkshire within the yr 2015 and 2018.

Brooks had termed Pujara ‘Steve’ whereas they each performed for Yorkshire as a result of he struggled to pronounce the India star’s forename.

Earlier within the week, Brooks’ title had appeared in Azeem Rafiq’s testimony in entrance of the Division for Digital, Tradition, Media and Sport choose committee. Rafiq had revealed that Brooks had begun the apply of referring to Pujara as ‘Steve’.

“On the subject of my naming in Azeem Rafiq’s assertion to MPs this week, the usage of the title ‘Steve’ associated to some individuals having tough names to pronounce. When this has occurred prior to now in a dressing room surroundings, it has been commonplace to offer nicknames, no matter creed or race. I admit to having used it on this context and now settle for that it was disrespectful and fallacious to take action,” mentioned Brooks as quoted by ESPNcricinfo.

“I’ve reached out and apologised to Cheteshwar for any offence that I’ve triggered him or his household. On the time, I didn’t recognise this as racist behaviour, however I can now see that it was not acceptable,” he added.

Brooks has additionally apologised for utilizing racist language in tweets relationship again to 2012. He had used the phrase “n**o” on Twitter 9 years in the past with England bowler Tymal Mills and Stewart Laudat.

“I acknowledge that the language utilized in two tweets I made in 2012 was unacceptable, and I deeply remorse utilizing it. I unreservedly apologise for any offence triggered to anyone who might have seen these tweets,” revealed Brooks.

“The 2 gamers to whom I despatched the tweets are my mates, and it was definitely not my intention to trigger misery or offence to them or anybody who learn them. It’s my understanding that neither particular person was offended on the time, however I settle for that language is vital and {that a} phrase I used might have triggered offence to others,” Brooks added additional.

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button